This information is over 2 years old. Information was current at time of publication.{"id":2052,"date":"2009-05-18T14:01:34","date_gmt":"2009-05-18T19:01:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/?p=2052"},"modified":"2009-05-18T14:01:34","modified_gmt":"2009-05-18T19:01:34","slug":"who%e2%80%99s-using-e-books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/who%e2%80%99s-using-e-books\/","title":{"rendered":"Who\u2019s Using E-books?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which Health Sciences Library System (HSLS) users are accessing e-books\u2014students, faculty, or clinicians? Do they prefer print or electronic for specific types of books? How should HSLS allocate its financial resources between print books and e-books?<\/p>\n<p>These questions led to a recent online survey of HSLS patrons. 5,293 surveys were distributed, with a response rate of over 16%.\u00a0 Preliminary findings have begun to expand our knowledge about user preferences, findings that will guide collection development decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Preliminary survey results indicate:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Survey respondents\u2019 preference for e-books or print books differs depending on the type of book.\u00a0 More preferred textbooks and manuals in print, while pharmaceutical books and reference books were preferred in electronic form.<br \/>\n\u2022 E-books are being used to support research and clinical care.\u00a0 Of the respondents, 77% of post-docs and 54% of the faculty use e-books in support of research. 75% of attending physicians, 86% of interns, residents and fellows, and 35% of nurses in the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) system reported using e-books to support clinical care.<br \/>\n\u2022 62% of University students reported choosing e-books to support class assignments, but only 12% of faculty members reported assigning readings from e-books to their students.<br \/>\n\u2022 HSLS users prefer e-books for quick reference or short reading tasks.<br \/>\n\u2022 The feature of e-books most valued by HSLS users is the ability to search the full text of a book.\u00a0 Not surprisingly, the HSLS full-text e-book search was the most favorably rated of the 5 e-book discovery tools on the HSLS Web site.<\/p>\n<p>As findings continue to be examined, more decisions can be made about the purchase of electronic versus print books. The principle investigator of the study, Barbara Folb, comments in her initial report, \u201cThe survey results support further development and promotion of the e-book collection, but not wholesale removal of the print collection from the shelves.\u00a0 Respondents value both formats, and make pragmatic choices based on issues of time, accessibility, and availability at point of need in choosing between print and e-books.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The survey was created and administered by Barbara Folb, with consultation from Leslie Czechowski and Charles Wessel. Folb is on leave from her faculty librarian position at HSLS to pursue a Master\u2019s of Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh.<\/p>\n<p>~ Leslie Czechowski and Barbara Folb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which Health Sciences Library System (HSLS) users are accessing e-books\u2014students, faculty, or clinicians? Do they prefer print or electronic for specific types of books? How should HSLS allocate its financial resources between print books and e-books? These questions led to a recent online survey of HSLS patrons. 5,293 surveys were distributed, with a response rate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"issue-archives","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[-1],"class_list":["post-2052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-june-2009","avhec_catgroup-issue-archives"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/info.hsls.pitt.edu\/updatereport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}